First, a sincere appeal
Saving lakes is tough work. It demands complex research, sourcing of information from multiple agencies, challenging field work, long hours of analysis and committed public interest litigation over years. All this is being done by the small group we are, largely without funding support. We could do much better if you support this ongoing effort. So please consider donating generously.
We particularly request philanthropies and philanthropists to consider giving to ESG. Your largeheartedness will help us help hundreds of communities across Karnataka in reclaiming lakes, raja kaluves (canals) and ponds, thus extending water security and public health for all. What’s more, we can turn our wetlands again into biodiversity rich areas they were, until recently.
Please continue reading about our ongoing efforts protecting and rehabilitating lakes in Bangalore and across Karnataka, in socially just and ecologically wise ways. This approach has drawn global acclamation, including from late Nobel laureate Prof. Elinor Ostrom and from UN Water which has recognised ESG’s lake protection efforts as a global best practice.
Background to our Lake Protection Public Interest Litigation efforts
On 11th April 2012, a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court issued a final order in a Public Interest Litigation filed by ESG (WP 817/2008) seeking an end to the policy of privatisation of lakes, and for advancing a participatory schema that would assist protection and rehabilitation of lakes (and their canal networks), in Bangalore and across Karnataka.
This PIL was heard over four years, and several interim directions were issued. These interim directions included inviting recommendations of a Committee set up under the Chairman of the Karnataka Legal Services Authority and then Judge of the Court, Mr. Justice N. K. Patil (since retd.) to propose steps to restore lakes as biodiversity rich, environmentally healthy and socially inclusive wetland ecosystems.
Following extensive consultations, field visits and meetings with various line departments and also wide range of publics, Justice Patil produce two reports, one proposing comprehensive guidelines for lake protection and rehabilitation, and the second on why policy of privatisation of lakes should not be persisted with. The High Court accepted both reports in its final order of 11th April 2012, in which it also directed the State to set up District Lake Protection Committees to guide lake protection and revival, and an apex quasi-judicial body at the State level headed by the Revenue Secretary.
This PIL brought to fore the weak institutional arrangement that existed then in protecting lakes and rajakaluves (canals). A direct result of this PIL was that the State Government formulating special law to protect lakes across the state guided by the Karnataka High Court order. The draft law underwent several revisions and amendments and the final law which is applicable statewide to protect and rehabilitate lakes and the canal network, and such other wetlands/water bodies, is the The Karnataka Tank Conservation And Development Authority
And Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2018.
As the lake protection committees were not set up for over a year after the High Court’s direction, ESG filed a Contempt Case against the Chief Secretary of Karnataka (CCC 1336/2013) in the High Court of Karnataka. The Contempt Case was closed after the Chief Secretary agreed to comply with the Karnataka High Court direction in WP 817/2008. Subsequently, the State Government issued a Government Order setting up District and State Lake Protection Committees.
In parallel, ESG preferred to file a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court of India (Civil Appeal 17166/2013) challenging a part of the Karnataka High Court order that had not quashed the lease agreements with three companies who were beneficiaries for commercialisation of lakes. This appeal is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court since.
In June 2019, Leo F. Saldanha and Environment Support Group impleaded in a PIL (WP 38401/2014; Citizen Action Group vs. State of Karnataka and ors.) which was being heard by the Principal Bench of the Karnataka High Court headed by Chief Justice Mr. Abhay Oka. These applications were allowed and a variety of directions are being issued. These include directing the State to demonstrated compliance with earlier High Court direction in WP 817/2008, taking cognisance of lake surveys conducted by Environmental Management Policy Research Institute, directing State Government to hire National Environmental Engineering Research Institute to produce a comprehensive report for Bangalore lakes rehabilitation, and also directing the State to facilitate Birdwatchers Field Club of Bangalore in conducing a survey of lakes as biodiversity rich areas, as was done by the group in 1989.
In addition, ESG has also represented to the State Government various causes to protect lakes, raja kaluves, and other wetland ecosystems, and to also ensure the lease agreements of lakes handed over to private parties are not renewed. In the case of Nagavara Lake which was leased to M/s Lumbini Gardens, the Karnataka Forest Department has refused to consent to the renewal. This decision has now been challenged in the Karnataka High Court by the aggrieved M/s Lumbini.
Provided below is a list of all the legal documents and reports pertaining to this cause that ESG advances, and will continue to.
First comprehensive effort to save lakes of Bangalore
Laxman Rao Committee Report, entitled, Of the Expert Committee for Preservation, Restoration or Otherwise of the Existing Tanks in Bangalore Metropolitan Area (1986).
Public Interest Petitions filed by Environment Support Group (WP 817/2008) and outcomes
ESG’s PIL on Lakes filed in High Court of Karnataka (WP 817/2008)
List of Lakes in Bangalore as listed in “Report of the Committee constituted by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka to examine the ground realities & prepare an Action Plan for preservation of lakes in the city of Bangalore (26th February 2011)” chaired by then Judge of the Karnataka High Court, Justice Mr. N. K. Patil (since Retd.).
Karnataka High Court Order in the case of B. Krishna Bhat Vs The State of Karnataka and Ors (WP 1841/2006).
ESG’s Contempt Petition against Karnataka Chief Secretary was dropped by the Karnataka High Court on confirmation that the Government would comply with directions issued in WP 817/2008
Government of Karnataka Orders in compliance with Karnataka High Court directions in Contempt Case, regarding constitution of Lake Protection Committees state wide. And also other related GOs.
ESG has appealed against a part of the order of the Karnataka High Court in WP 817/2008, as the agreements privatising lakes in Bangalore were not quashed. The matter is pending adjudication in the Supreme Court of India.
Leo Saldanha (as party in person) and ESG impleaded in a PIL filed by Citizens Action Group before the Karnataka High Court. Various unprecedented orders to support ecologically wise and socially just rehabilitation of lakes have been issued. The Court has also held the State accountable for non-implementation of order in WP 817/2008
ESG’s Impleading Application in WP 38401/2014 (Citizens Action Group Vs the State of Karnataka and Ors).
Affidavit filed in WP 38401/2014, dated 27th August 2019, pertaining to status of Begur Lake, Jaraganahalli & Yelachenahalli lakes, and Venkatrayanakere and Annexures showing the status of these lakes and the degree of degradation over the years.
Affidavit filed in WP 38401/2014, dated 27th November 2019, inviting the Karnataka High Court’s attention to a map showing Yelachenahalli Lake with encroachments; on the questionable claim of Jaraganahalli tank to be a private property and the need for a systematic ecological survey of Bangalore lakes as Waterbird Habitat.
Affidavit filed in WP 38401/2014, dated 28th February 2020, pertaining to the update of the survey of Bangalore lakes as Habitats for Migratory Birds, facilitation of wetland survey, studying the health of lakes with plankton analysis, responses to affidavits dated 13th February filed by Revenue Secretary, overview of observations on the MoUs and DPRs made available by the KTCDA and the status of Bhimenahalli lake, Ramnagara district and Annexures.
Public Interest Litigations relating to Bellandur Lake complex
- Mantri Techzone Pvt Ltd. Vs Forward Foundation (Civil Appeal No. 5016 of 2016).
- National Green Tribunal Order in Bellandur Lake (Original Application No. 222 of 2014)
- National Green Tribunal Order for Bellandur Lake (Original Application No. 217 of 2017 and 125 of 2017).
Documentation relating to Lake Protection and Rehabilitation activities of ESG, and other useful documents
- Wise Use, Conservation, Protection, Rehabilitation and Appropriate Governance of Lakes as Commons in Karnataka in English, click here and to read in Kannada, click here.
- Submission of wise use practices for the protection, management and rehabilitation of lakes in Karnataka with special emphasis on Bangalore and other urban areas, click here.
- Comic Strip on Consequences of Privatisation of Lakes in Bangalore, click here.
- Independent Report On Status of Lakes in Bangalore Under Lake Development Authority, click here.
- Survey of Irrigation Tanks as Wetland Bird Habitat in the Bangalore Area, India (1989), click here.
- Performance audit on Conservation and Ecological restoration of Lakes under the jurisdiction of Lake Development Authority and Urban Local Bodies (2015) by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, click here.
- Karnataka Legislature’s Joint House Committee reports, Part 1 and Part 2 ,on Encroachment of Government Lands in Bangalore City/ Urban District
- EMPRI report “Inventorisation of Water Bodies in Bangalore Metropolitan Area (BMA)”. Final Volume I, Final Volume II South, Final Volume II North, Final Volume II East, Final Volume II Anekal.
- December 2019 Advertisement by the Government of Karnataka stating its policy of beautifying and developing Tank and Lakes under Corporate Social Responsibility Scheme.
- Final Report of Technical Committee for Inspection of Three Breached Tanks in BBMP Limits and for Suggestions To Prevent Further Such Incidents, dated 20th January 2020